Back to login
Subaru XV Crosstrek
Model Overview
Subaru’s first venture into the subcompact crossover segment is the XV Crosstrek. Based on the company’s Impreza hatchback, the Crosstrek boasts more visual personality with its raised suspension, bold colour options and black fender flares. It also combines generous ground clearance with Subaru’s excellent AWD tech, making this an appealing winter warrior and a capable vehicle for light off-roading. The model was renamed to Crosstrek in 2016.
Photos
Reviews and News
Owner Scores
Comfort
N/A
Performance
N/A
Fuel Economy
N/A
Interior Design
N/A
Exterior Styling
N/A
Reliability
N/A
Owner Reviews
Klode1964
The end of Subies as we knew them
March 10, 2018
Overall Score
I'll start by saying that this is our 4th Subie in 20 years. And our last! Subaru has a loyal following and we were part of it: great winter driving, safety and build quality. My 2015 Crosstrek has 32000 km on it and is already rusting. And the radio. Of my, the radio! I have spent the last 2 winters without Bluetooth because it only works above 5 degrees celsius, which is April to November where I live. several trips to the dealer, and it became apparent that they know the Clarion radios fitted on new Subarus are crap, but are blocked by Subaru Canada who tells them to not change them. Instead they try firmware upgrades trying to solve what is really a hardware problem (I work in avionics). So I've gone from a Subaru promoter to telling everyone who considers one to not bother. Which is unfortunate because where I live this is a well suited vehicle (all-wheel-drive, high ground clearance). Otherwise, the Crosstrek is OK: no torque, which means you load the clutch a lot on every start, imprecise gearbox, tiny trunk (bizarrely a lot of rear seat legroom, but the rear bench does not track). My recommendation: Don't buy unless you want rust and a poor radio.
Comfort
6
Performance
2
Fuel Economy
4
Interior Design
6
Exterior Styling
10
Reliability
6
Recall Information
* Data provided by Transport Canada
Recall number
Recall date
System affected
Model year(s) affected
Recall number
2019-104
Recall date
2019-03-01
System affected
Brakes
Model year(s) affected
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Manufacturer Recall Number:
WUE-90
Units Affected:
135,814
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
Issue:
On certain vehicles, the brake lamp switch could fail. This would cause the brake lamps not to turn on when the brakes are applied. Depending on the model, this could cause an inability to shift from park or to start using the push-button ignition. This may also cause problems with the following: anti-lock brake system (ABS), vehicle dynamics control (VDC), and/or Eyesight system.
Safety Risk:
If the brake lights do not work, a following driver may not to recognize that a vehicle ahead is braking, increasing the risk of crash.
Corrective Actions:
The company will notify owners by mail. Owners will be instructed to take their vehicle to a dealer to have the brake lamp switch replaced.
Recall number
2018-606
Recall date
2018-11-02
System affected
Engine
Model year(s) affected
2013
Manufacturer Recall Number:
WTY-84
Units Affected:
19,164
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, the engine valve springs could fracture, causing an engine failure or a stall with an inability to restart. This could increase the risk of a crash causing injury and/or damage to property. Correction: Dealers will replace the engine valve springs. Note: A driver may notice abnormal noise and/or vibration prior to an engine failure or stalling.
Recall number
2015-249
Recall date
2015-06-04
System affected
Accessories
Model year(s) affected
2015
Manufacturer Recall Number:
WQS-54
Units Affected:
4,587
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles, if the driver assist system were to become disabled due to a brake light switch failure, the system could fail to inform the driver that the automatic braking, adaptive cruise control and pre-collision braking systems are disabled. This could increase the risk of a crash causing injury and/or damage to property. Correction: Dealers will reprogram the driver assist system.
Recall number
2015-206
Recall date
2015-05-15
System affected
Accessories
Model year(s) affected
2015
Manufacturer Recall Number:
WQO-51
Units Affected:
3,500
Notification Type:
Compliance Mfr
On certain vehicles equipped with EyeSight driver assist technology, the French version of the EyeSight Owner’s Manual my contain incorrect translations of certain text. If the vehicle were to be operated as described in the mistranslated French text, it could increase the risk of a crash. Correction: Subaru will send corrected French EyeSight manuals directly to affected vehicle owners and additional corrected manuals will be available to all Dealers.
Recall number
2013-063
Recall date
2013-02-25
System affected
Accessories
Model year(s) affected
2013
Manufacturer Recall Number:
WQF-42
Units Affected:
2,813
Notification Type:
Safety Mfr
On certain vehicles equipped with a dealer-installed accessory remote engine starter, if the fob is dropped, movement of the internal battery retaining clip may occur and cause damage to a component on the printed circuit board. Under this condition, the fob may transmit an engine start (or stop) request without the user pressing the button. If the vehicle is in range and receives the request, the engine may start and run for up to 15 minutes (or until a stop request is received). The engine may continue to start and stop until the fob battery is depleted, or until the vehicle runs out of fuel. If that occurs when the vehicle is parked in an enclosed area, such as a garage, there is a risk of carbon monoxide build-up, which could result in asphyxiation or carbon monoxide poisoning. Correction: Dealers will replace the remote engine starter fob.
Recall number
2013-058
Recall date
2013-02-19
System affected
Other
Model year(s) affected
2012 2013
Manufacturer Recall Number:
Units Affected:
4,800
Notification Type:
Compliance Mfr
Certain vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 205 - Glazing Materials. The "DOT" symbol, the "AS3" code mark and/or the manufacturer's number ("44") markings may have been inadvertently omitted from the rear glazing. Correction: Since this does not pose any safety risk, no corrective action is required.
Select Another Vehicle